Samsung could again call on Qualcomm to host its flagship Galaxy 2016. S7 would be proposed under 820 Snapdragon Exynos 8890 or by region. The geographical distribution is accurate.
Samsung preferred to spend Qualcomm services to animate its top smartphones range this year but all indications are that the decision was related to the overheating problems of Snapdragon 810 rather than taken from the start. Everything, or the simple fact that seems ready to revive the foundry to launch its next flagship, the Galaxy S7. The rumors concerning the existence of a variant on Snapdragon 820 plus a sub Exynos are becoming more insistent. Even the famous news agency Reuters gets started, bringing to pass a few more details.
Snapdragon 820 for the USA and China, Exynos 8890 elsewhere
As always, both variants should be aimed at different markets. In the case of S7 Galaxy, led by Qualcomm that would be sold in the United States and China. So only two markets, but two important markets. That should reassure the chipmaker whose results have not been very good this year. The rest of the world, including Europe and France, should logically deal with the model as Exynos, which is certainly not a bad performance given the latest model. Hopefully the next one will be even better.
5.2 inch screen and 4 GB of RAM
For now, all we know, is that it could be the first to enjoy the customized hearts of the Korean group, the famous Mongoose, and take the number 8890. It would also be supported by 4 GB of RAM onboard the Galaxy S7 also expected with a screen 5.2 inches and a dual camera sensor. Note in passing that a declination with 5.7 inch screen would also be in the pipes. Not to mention the one with curved screen, unless they will act the same and that it thus follows in the footsteps of Galaxy S6 + Edge.
Many questions therefore still above plannent the next Samsung flagship course, but we are counting on the coming leaks to respond before the official announcement, even if the wait may be shorter than in previous years for the latter. January has already been mentioned several times.
No comments:
Post a Comment