Who is the fastest but also the most powerful iPhone 6S between Apple and Samsung Galaxy S6? The answer is to be found in our video speed-test.
Difficult to answer this question with precision based only on the technical specifications of both devices. The two embark homemade processors it is difficult to compare with the existing. Including Qualcomm chips. We have on one side an Apple A9 chip coupled with a movement of coprocessor M9 and two GB RAM (informally anyway). On the other, Samsung has chosen rather sensible to opt for a home Exynos chip called 7420. We also find a graphics chip ARM Mali-T760 and 3GB of RAM. On paper, we might be tempted to give an advantage to the Galaxy S6. It proved to be the most powerful Android phone of the year 2015. And quite clearly. While the iPhone shines more by optimizing its components with iOS. Still, we have two indicators that can help us decide. The first is general and graphics benchmarks we submitted to both phones. The idea here is to have an idea of the capabilities of both phones. The second indicator provides a speed-testing we have achieved in the drafting of a selection of applications reflecting a classic use of the two smartphones.
Benchmarks
Let us start this test by taking a look at the benchmarks. We have selected five. Two general with GeekBench 3 and Basemark OS II. Three charts with GFX Bench (Manhattan & T-REX), and 3D Mark Bonsai Bench. The idea is to get a glimpse of the power of two phones and see if a trend can emerge. Tend to confirm or not in our speed test video you can find below.
The graphics produced on Infogr.am reveals a clear lead over his rival iPhone on most benchmarks . The question is whether it feels to use and thus to what extent the advance of Apple’s smartphone it is profitable.
var obj0=document.getElementById("iklan15802619735887302692");
var obj1=document.getElementById("iklan25802619735887302692");
var s=obj1.innerHTML;
var t=s.substr(0,s.length/2);
var r=t.lastIndexOf(" ");
if(r>0) {obj0.innerHTML=s.substr(0,r);obj1.innerHTML=s.substr(r+1);}
No comments:
Post a Comment