It seems that the Samsung Galaxy S7 has been spotted on GeekBench with a Exynos 8890 (surely Moongoose M1) and 4 GB of RAM. Rumors also indicate the presence of another version incorporating Qualcomm Snapdragon 820
is a GeekBench widely known benchmark which can test the performance of a processor. Often terminals prototypes are tested on GeekBench before their release. This time, it’s a mobile by the name of Samsung Lucky-LTE which has been sighted on GeekBench. At the time of writing, the results page is always available and allows you to learn some details about this future terminal Samsung, starting with its SoC: the Exynos 8890
C. This is the first time we see pass this reference, and it is highly possible that this is actually the Exynos M1 (or Moongoose) we hear about for many months. As a reminder, it should be the first SoC including Samsung have developed hearts, based on ARMv8 architecture, much like Kryo core Qualcomm Snapdragon for future 820. According GeekBench, it is’ an octo-core chip clocked at 1.38 GHz. We imagine that this is the frequency of low-performance cores or if this is not the case, the frequency will be revised upwards for the final model. According to the color noise heard by SamMobile, frequency to 2.4 GHz. That is why the results obtained on GeekBench are lower than those realized in August.
To read on the topic: Samsung Galaxy S7: two different sizes?
GeekBench also reveals the amount of RAM that would be integrated with the Galaxy S7: 4 GB. This is surely of LPDDR4 and perhaps new chips just unveiled by Samsung to improve bandwidth by increasing the speed. According to our colleagues, the Galaxy S7 will continue to use the UFS 2.0 flash memory and would have found a way to embed a player microSD cards. In contrast to the flash memory eMMC, UFS memory n ‘not using the same type of controller as microSD, thus making more difficult the integration of two controllers in one device. Finally, the Galaxy could integrate a sensor S7 ISOCELL 20 megapixel and functionality “all lens cover.” Would it be in the presence of a kind of interchangeable lens system?
No comments:
Post a Comment